Reason it is not

The Gazoo had another letter this morning making a "reasonable" plea for intelligent design. What I don't understand is why these people just don't seem to realize that no matter the ID claims, no matter how reasonable they seem, no matter who believes them, ID is not science. Science looks at the world through what it perceives and that knowledge that can be obtained with the five senses: sight, sound, smell, taste and touch. ID does not meet the test of that concept, no matter how it is looked at. What makes people insist that it is a majority issue, when that "majority" they infer pits a number of non-scientists against the vast majority of true scientists. Folks, ID is not science. Period. End of Discussion.